I not only believe she should resign, but I believe she should be prosecuted for lying under oath in today’s hearing and in her confirmation hearing. She should be impeached. In addition to that, she should lose her ability to practice law. She is an abomination, just like her Lord and Savior, Trump.
Prosecution is the second step — but only after she is no longer in office, whether by resignation, impeachment, or the next election.
If someone in public office is alleged to have committed a crime — especially something as serious as lying under oath — the proper sequence under the law is:
Removal from Office
• Resignation
• Impeachment or equivalent removal process
• Loss of reelection
Then Criminal Accountability
Once she is no longer protected by her official position, prosecutors can pursue charges without the constitutional and practical complications that come with prosecuting a sitting officeholder.
This order respects both:
Constitutional norms, and
Rule of law procedures
Removing someone from office doesn’t guarantee prosecution — that still requires evidence meeting legal standards — but it does remove the political shield that often protects officials from accountability.
All those options are valid in the pre-MAGA age but the landscape has changed.
For starters, Bondi is not going to resign unless Trump givers her a pardon.
Impeachment is not gonna fly as long as she has the ability to dig up stuff on her republican colleague using the DOJ investigation apparatus. Beside, there might be a sufficient number of republican senators listed in the Trump-Epstein Pedo files to keep them from convicting her during an impeachment trail.
The only hope to remove her and release the entire file as the law dictates is a Blue Wave un the midterms.
It's true that it falls on the senate when an impeachment trial fails to convict a culpable individual. More to the point, if falls on the party that fails to convict if the votes are split along partisan lines like it had in Trump's two impeachments. That's because it is an inherently political process. One can argue that this ia a flaw written into the constitution but that's a debate for a later date.
You’re right that impeachment is political by design. But that doesn’t make accountability optional. When votes split purely along party lines in the face of evidence, that’s not “just politics” — that’s a choice. And voters are allowed to judge that choice.
The Constitution didn’t create partisanship. It created a mechanism. How senators use it is on them — and on the parties that protect them.
Law can be political in process. It cannot be partisan in principle.
I believe she should resign due to her conduct in today’s hearing.
Furthermore, there are legitimate grounds for an independent investigation into whether her sworn testimony violated perjury laws.
If evidence supports it, appropriate legal and professional consequences should follow, including referral for disciplinary review and potential removal from office.
I have absolutely ZERO respect for this woman. How could she not even ACKNOWLEDGE the survivors? And she was so rude and disrespectful to several Committee members. Guess thats how Trump likes 'em..cold and cruel.
💯 What she displayed goes beyond bad conduct — it raises real questions about whether she should be held accountable under the same standards as everyone else.
Her behavior in that hearing was deeply troubling and showed a serious lack of respect. If her actions rise to the level of ethical or legal violations, then she should face appropriate disciplinary review and legal scrutiny under the law. Everyone, including officials and lawyers, should be held to the same standards.
We need to change the law to allow local bar associations to investigate any lawyer, including people in the sitting administration. This is ridiculous !!
You’re hitting on an important gap: right now, disciplinary authority for lawyers is fragmented and often slow, especially when it comes to high-profile public officials.
Local and state bar associations do have the power to investigate misconduct — but the process is inconsistent, and there are limits when someone moves into federal office or sits in a position with political insulation.
If we want meaningful accountability for lawyers in positions of power — including those serving in the administration — then yes, the standards and mechanisms for investigation and discipline need to be clear, consistent, and independent of political influence.
That doesn’t just help one case — it strengthens the rule of law overall.
Resign, yes, and then be put on trial for the crimes she has committed and/or aided and abetted in, along with the other members of this misadministration.
Resignation can be a first step in restoring trust when someone’s conduct has raised serious questions. After that, if there is credible evidence of crimes, the next step is for law-enforcement authorities to review that evidence, investigate thoroughly, and — if appropriate — pursue charges through the proper legal process.
In our system, criminal prosecution isn’t decided by public opinion; it’s decided by prosecutors who assess whether the legal elements of an offense have been met and whether a case can be proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
What you’re really pointing to is this: no one should be above the law, and if someone’s actions potentially meet the legal definition of wrongdoing, then they should be subject to investigation like anyone else.
She’s totally unhinged. This is what you get when you protect pedophiles. It begins to eat you up from the inside. She’s now a deranged angry monster. Get into bed with Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump and this is what happens to you.
"We, the People of the UNITED States," peacefully protest, text, and call Congress to demand that they impeach AND convict AG Bondi for lying, obstructing, and redacting the Epstein files.
Later, she will be jailed with the fake evangelical, morally depraved, misogynistic child rapist, Epstein pal, pathological liar, thin-skinned narcissist, 34-count felon, draft dodger, war criminal, and mentally unfit racist and Hitleresque Project 2025 "Above the Law" wannabe King Trump, along with his corrupt Administration MAGA Minions in Alligator Alcatraz, caged with the immigrants they detained there.
Absolutely. And if she doesn’t resign (she won’t), she should be impeached or fired. She is supposed to work for the people, and she makes it perfectly clear that she only works for the felon in the WH.
You’re not alone in feeling that way. When someone in public office repeatedly demonstrates that their priorities don’t align with the people they’re supposed to serve, it’s reasonable to call for their removal — whether that’s through resignation, firing, or whatever lawful process applies.
If an official refuses to step down despite serious concerns about their conduct, then holding them accountable through the proper mechanisms — whether legislative oversight, impeachment where applicable, or administrative removal — is exactly what a healthy system demands.
Public officials are supposed to be accountable to the people. When their actions suggest otherwise, the focus shifts from rhetoric to real consequences.
All those options are valid in the pre-MAGA age but the landscape has changed.
For starters, Bondi is not going to resign unless Trump givers her a pardon.
Impeachment is not gonna fly as long as she has the ability to dig up stuff on her republican colleague using the DOJ investigation apparatus. Beside, there might be a sufficient number of republican senators listed in the Trump-Epstein Pedo files to keep them from convicting her during an impeachment trail.
The only hope to remove her and release the entire file as the law dictates is a Blue Wave un the midterms.
I not only believe she should resign, but I believe she should be prosecuted for lying under oath in today’s hearing and in her confirmation hearing. She should be impeached. In addition to that, she should lose her ability to practice law. She is an abomination, just like her Lord and Savior, Trump.
Doesn't she give off vibes that she became an attorney specifically to HURT people?
Her approach to law and public enforcement consistently seems focused on antagonism and punishment rather than fairness and protection.
Prosecution is the second step that follows removal from office either by resignation, impeachment, or through the next presidential election.
Prosecution is the second step — but only after she is no longer in office, whether by resignation, impeachment, or the next election.
If someone in public office is alleged to have committed a crime — especially something as serious as lying under oath — the proper sequence under the law is:
Removal from Office
• Resignation
• Impeachment or equivalent removal process
• Loss of reelection
Then Criminal Accountability
Once she is no longer protected by her official position, prosecutors can pursue charges without the constitutional and practical complications that come with prosecuting a sitting officeholder.
This order respects both:
Constitutional norms, and
Rule of law procedures
Removing someone from office doesn’t guarantee prosecution — that still requires evidence meeting legal standards — but it does remove the political shield that often protects officials from accountability.
Thank you for your clarification.
Appreciate that. Precision matters when the stakes are this high.
You are right and very precise. Thank you!right and very precise. Thank you!
Keep the connection with me 🫂
All those options are valid in the pre-MAGA age but the landscape has changed.
For starters, Bondi is not going to resign unless Trump givers her a pardon.
Impeachment is not gonna fly as long as she has the ability to dig up stuff on her republican colleague using the DOJ investigation apparatus. Beside, there might be a sufficient number of republican senators listed in the Trump-Epstein Pedo files to keep them from convicting her during an impeachment trail.
The only hope to remove her and release the entire file as the law dictates is a Blue Wave un the midterms.
Institutions don’t collapse because the landscape changes. They collapse when we accept that they have.
If accountability depends on party control, then the rule of law is already compromised.
Power shielding power is not a new era — it’s the oldest pattern in politics.
If impeachment fails, it exposes the Senate — not the Constitution.
Midterms matter. But law cannot be seasonal.
If pardons are the shield, then the system is the story.
We don’t abandon process because it’s hard. We test it because it is.
It's true that it falls on the senate when an impeachment trial fails to convict a culpable individual. More to the point, if falls on the party that fails to convict if the votes are split along partisan lines like it had in Trump's two impeachments. That's because it is an inherently political process. One can argue that this ia a flaw written into the constitution but that's a debate for a later date.
You’re right that impeachment is political by design. But that doesn’t make accountability optional. When votes split purely along party lines in the face of evidence, that’s not “just politics” — that’s a choice. And voters are allowed to judge that choice.
The Constitution didn’t create partisanship. It created a mechanism. How senators use it is on them — and on the parties that protect them.
Law can be political in process. It cannot be partisan in principle.
This!
I believe she should resign due to her conduct in today’s hearing.
Furthermore, there are legitimate grounds for an independent investigation into whether her sworn testimony violated perjury laws.
If evidence supports it, appropriate legal and professional consequences should follow, including referral for disciplinary review and potential removal from office.
Jail would be more appropriate
I like that too!
I have absolutely ZERO respect for this woman. How could she not even ACKNOWLEDGE the survivors? And she was so rude and disrespectful to several Committee members. Guess thats how Trump likes 'em..cold and cruel.
WHITE, cold, and cruel.
Totally — not even saying “I hear you” to survivors in that room feels like a conscious choice, not an accident.
Agree 🤢
She should be disbarred and prosecuted. I have never in my life seen such a vile display of hatred, lying, gaslighting, cowardice, and callousness.
Thank you for describing her disgusting performance truthfully. Such a lack of respect, competence & definitely no heart. She needs to resign!!
Yep. People like that have a hard fall on the way down
💯 What she displayed goes beyond bad conduct — it raises real questions about whether she should be held accountable under the same standards as everyone else.
Disbarred from practice in USA & ideally prison for obstruction & perjury
Agree 💯
Ideally she goes to prison. Definitely should have been disbarred when she was at in Florida. Long overdue.
Her behavior in that hearing was deeply troubling and showed a serious lack of respect. If her actions rise to the level of ethical or legal violations, then she should face appropriate disciplinary review and legal scrutiny under the law. Everyone, including officials and lawyers, should be held to the same standards.
We need to change the law to allow local bar associations to investigate any lawyer, including people in the sitting administration. This is ridiculous !!
You’re hitting on an important gap: right now, disciplinary authority for lawyers is fragmented and often slow, especially when it comes to high-profile public officials.
Local and state bar associations do have the power to investigate misconduct — but the process is inconsistent, and there are limits when someone moves into federal office or sits in a position with political insulation.
If we want meaningful accountability for lawyers in positions of power — including those serving in the administration — then yes, the standards and mechanisms for investigation and discipline need to be clear, consistent, and independent of political influence.
That doesn’t just help one case — it strengthens the rule of law overall.
Resign, yes, and then be put on trial for the crimes she has committed and/or aided and abetted in, along with the other members of this misadministration.
Resignation can be a first step in restoring trust when someone’s conduct has raised serious questions. After that, if there is credible evidence of crimes, the next step is for law-enforcement authorities to review that evidence, investigate thoroughly, and — if appropriate — pursue charges through the proper legal process.
In our system, criminal prosecution isn’t decided by public opinion; it’s decided by prosecutors who assess whether the legal elements of an offense have been met and whether a case can be proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
What you’re really pointing to is this: no one should be above the law, and if someone’s actions potentially meet the legal definition of wrongdoing, then they should be subject to investigation like anyone else.
She’s totally unhinged. This is what you get when you protect pedophiles. It begins to eat you up from the inside. She’s now a deranged angry monster. Get into bed with Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump and this is what happens to you.
Yep..her soul is vile 🤮. There is no humanity in her.
"We, the People of the UNITED States," peacefully protest, text, and call Congress to demand that they impeach AND convict AG Bondi for lying, obstructing, and redacting the Epstein files.
Later, she will be jailed with the fake evangelical, morally depraved, misogynistic child rapist, Epstein pal, pathological liar, thin-skinned narcissist, 34-count felon, draft dodger, war criminal, and mentally unfit racist and Hitleresque Project 2025 "Above the Law" wannabe King Trump, along with his corrupt Administration MAGA Minions in Alligator Alcatraz, caged with the immigrants they detained there.
Strong Together. UNITED We Stand.
She needs to face prosecution and many years of jail for aiding and abetting known criminals
Its inevitable 🟠
Absolutely. And if she doesn’t resign (she won’t), she should be impeached or fired. She is supposed to work for the people, and she makes it perfectly clear that she only works for the felon in the WH.
You’re not alone in feeling that way. When someone in public office repeatedly demonstrates that their priorities don’t align with the people they’re supposed to serve, it’s reasonable to call for their removal — whether that’s through resignation, firing, or whatever lawful process applies.
If an official refuses to step down despite serious concerns about their conduct, then holding them accountable through the proper mechanisms — whether legislative oversight, impeachment where applicable, or administrative removal — is exactly what a healthy system demands.
Public officials are supposed to be accountable to the people. When their actions suggest otherwise, the focus shifts from rhetoric to real consequences.
Yes
Yesterday already.
Some asshole voted no to her resigning get him out of Substack
All those options are valid in the pre-MAGA age but the landscape has changed.
For starters, Bondi is not going to resign unless Trump givers her a pardon.
Impeachment is not gonna fly as long as she has the ability to dig up stuff on her republican colleague using the DOJ investigation apparatus. Beside, there might be a sufficient number of republican senators listed in the Trump-Epstein Pedo files to keep them from convicting her during an impeachment trail.
The only hope to remove her and release the entire file as the law dictates is a Blue Wave un the midterms.