If there’s one thing Trump and his MAGA movement have mastered, it’s the art of contradiction. The same man who spent years railing against “endless wars” and “nation-building” is now casually floating the idea of the United States owning Gaza. The same “America First” crowd that mocked support for Ukraine as “globalist meddling” is now enthusiastically embracing a U.S.-led occupation of Palestinian territory.
And yet, somehow, none of them see the irony.
Trump’s Gaza Proposal: U.S. Control, Ethnic Cleansing, and Nation-Building
At a Feb. 4, 2025, press conference alongside Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Trump laid out a stunningly aggressive vision for Gaza’s future. He suggested forcibly relocating all 1.7 million Palestinians from Gaza, effectively wiping the territory clean of its current population, and then putting the U.S. in charge of its long-term redevelopment.
His words were jarring:
“The U.S. will take over the Gaza Strip, and we will do a job with it, too… We’ll own it.”
He went on to suggest that the U.S. would rebuild Gaza into a kind of “Dubai 2.0”. He did not rule out deploying American troops to accomplish this vision. In other words, Trump was openly proposing ethnic cleansing, military occupation, and U.S.-led nation-building—the exact policies he and his movement have spent years denouncing.
The Great MAGA Hypocrisy: Ukraine vs. Gaza
For years, MAGA Republicans have preached about the evils of foreign intervention. Trump’s entire 2016 campaign was built on condemning “endless wars” and promising to end U.S. involvement in costly conflicts abroad. He attacked nation-building in Iraq and Afghanistan. He mocked “globalist” leaders for supporting Ukraine’s defense against Russia, claiming it wasn’t “our problem.”
And yet, now that it’s Gaza, suddenly Trump and his allies are all in on foreign intervention. They want U.S. involvement—not just to support Israel but to take full control of Gaza, expel its people, and remake it from the ground up.
The hypocrisy is so blatant it’s almost comical.
When Ukraine fights off an invading force, MAGA calls it “not our business.”
When Trump suggests U.S. occupation of Gaza, MAGA calls it “brilliant.”
Make it make sense.
MAGA’s Double Standard on Foreign Policy
Let’s take a look at just how much Trump’s allies have twisted themselves into knots trying to justify this double standard.
Sen. J.D. Vance (R-OH): A Walking Contradiction
J.D. Vance was one of the most vocal critics of U.S. aid to Ukraine, famously saying:
“I don’t really care what happens to Ukraine one way or another.”
He insisted America had no business sending billions to help Ukraine defend itself against Russia, arguing that we should focus on our own border instead. But fast-forward to Trump’s Gaza plan, and Vance suddenly has no problem with massive U.S. involvement in the Middle East. In late 2024, he endorsed Trump’s proposal, declaring:
“Israel is going to finish it, and we want to give Israel the right and the ability to finish what Hamas started.”
So Ukraine? Not our problem. Gaza? Full-scale U.S. intervention. What happened to “America First”?
Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-CO): From “No Foreign Aid” to Full Support for Israel
Boebert once blasted U.S. support for Ukraine, calling it “disgusting” and demanding that Congress stop prioritizing foreign conflicts over American issues. But the moment Israel was involved, Boebert flipped, tweeting:
“Israel is our closest ally in the world. We need to stand by Israel in this deadly situation!”
Her logic: Supporting Ukraine = bad. Supporting Israeli military actions, including the displacement of 1.7 million Palestinians? Suddenly, that’s just fine.
David Friedman & Marco Rubio: The MAGA Foreign Policy Pivot
Even Trump’s former U.S. ambassador to Israel, David Friedman, who once warned about “reckless intervention,” now calls Trump’s plan “brilliant, historic, and the only idea I have heard in 50 years.”
Meanwhile, Sen. Marco Rubio, a staunch critic of U.S. foreign wars, suddenly sees no problem with a U.S.-led reconstruction of Gaza, saying:
“We are ready to Make Gaza Beautiful Again.”
It’s almost like these people don’t actually believe in anything.
The Real MAGA Foreign Policy: Whatever Trump Says, Goes
What this all proves is simple: MAGA’s foreign policy has never been about “America First.” It has never been about opposing war or avoiding foreign entanglements. It has always been about whatever Donald Trump feels like saying in the moment.
If Trump says no to Ukraine? MAGA says no.
If Trump says yes to Gaza? MAGA says yes.
It’s ideology by convenience, a foreign policy guided by nothing but blind loyalty to Trump.
Conclusion: The Ultimate Flip-Flop
Trump and his MAGA followers have spent nearly a decade telling us that the U.S. should avoid foreign entanglements, stop nation-building, and focus only on domestic issues. But the second Trump suggests owning Gaza and forcibly removing its people, those same “America First” conservatives abandon all their supposed principles.
This isn’t just hypocrisy—it’s a total exposure of the MAGA movement’s lack of any consistent beliefs. Their foreign policy positions aren’t about protecting American interests or avoiding unnecessary wars. They’re about following Trump, no matter how absurdly contradictory his ideas become.
And if tomorrow he changes his mind again? MAGA will follow right along, proving once again that “America First” was never really about America at all—it was just about Trump.