There's this terrible conundrum I've been staring at for a while. We have no organized/unified opposition because we have no heavy hitting/focused leadership. But organization is required to generate leadership. I see that the congressional progressive caucus, which is 95+ members, could make themselves a unified leader of the opposition…
There's this terrible conundrum I've been staring at for a while. We have no organized/unified opposition because we have no heavy hitting/focused leadership. But organization is required to generate leadership. I see that the congressional progressive caucus, which is 95+ members, could make themselves a unified leader of the opposition. Every one of those 95+ members brings people, resources, and publicity. It would be very potent.
There's this terrible conundrum I've been staring at for a while. We have no organized/unified opposition because we have no heavy hitting/focused leadership. But organization is required to generate leadership. I see that the congressional progressive caucus, which is 95+ members, could make themselves a unified leader of the opposition. Every one of those 95+ members brings people, resources, and publicity. It would be very potent.